• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Vancouver BC Litigation Lawyers: Hobbs Giroday

Header Right

Call us today: (604) 669-6609  Toll free: 1 (844) 568-1004

  • About
    • Vision & Values
    • Fee Arrangements
    • Organizational Memberships
    • Testimonials
  • Practice Areas
    • Estate Solutions
      • Probate
      • Validity of Wills
      • Wills, Estates and Succession Act (“WESA”)
      • Trust Litigation
      • Articles
    • Negligence
      • Professional Negligence
      • Medical Malpractice
      • Dental Malpractice
      • Personal Injury
      • Products Liability
      • Articles
    • Business Law
      • Contractual Disputes
      • Enforcement of Judgments
      • Debt Collection
      • Shareholder Disputes
      • Securities Litigation
      • Construction
  • Our Team
    • David Hobbs
    • Ian Giroday
    • Dylan Segal
    • Or Regev
    • Austin DeBrincat
    • Danielle Carman
  • Resources
    • Podcasts
    • FAQ Videos
    • All Articles
    • Publications
      • Legal Articles
      • Case Comments
      • Reported Cases
      • Business Law Resources
    • Media
    • Speaking Engagements
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • About
    • Vision & Values
    • Fee Arrangements
    • Organizational Memberships
    • Testimonials
  • Practice Areas
    • Estate Solutions
      • Probate
      • Validity of Wills
      • Wills, Estates and Succession Act (“WESA”)
      • Trust Litigation
      • Articles
    • Negligence
      • Professional Negligence
      • Medical Malpractice
      • Dental Malpractice
      • Personal Injury
      • Products Liability
      • Articles
    • Business Law
      • Contractual Disputes
      • Enforcement of Judgments
      • Debt Collection
      • Shareholder Disputes
      • Securities Litigation
      • Construction
  • Our Team
    • David Hobbs
    • Ian Giroday
    • Dylan Segal
    • Or Regev
    • Austin DeBrincat
    • Danielle Carman
  • Resources
    • Podcasts
    • FAQ Videos
    • All Articles
    • Publications
      • Legal Articles
      • Case Comments
      • Reported Cases
      • Business Law Resources
    • Media
    • Speaking Engagements
  • Careers
  • Contact

Curing Deficiencies in Wills

December 19, 2017 //  by Editor

by David Hobbs

The law in British Columbia changed with S. 58 of the Wills, Estates and Succession Act to provide the Court with statutory power to cure deficiencies in people making, revoking, altering and reviving wills even though the person did not comply with all formal legal requirements to do so.

S. 58 broadly defines what may constitute a record. If the Court finds that a record, document or writing or marking on a will or document represents: the testamentary intentions of a deceased person; the intention of a deceased person to make, revoke, alter or revive a will or testamentary disposition of the deceased person; or the intention of a deceased person to revoke, alter or revive a testamentary disposition contained in a document other than a will, the Court may order that the record or document or writing or marking on a will or document be fully effective as though it had been made in a legally proper manner. The section also gives the Court power to deal with words made illegible by alterations if the Court can find what the original word was.

In Australia in a 2010 case where a lawyer had prepared a will for a testator but, the will was never signed due to the testator passing away in hospital, the Supreme Court of Western Australia held the unsigned will was effective as if it had been signed.

In a 2012 case in the High Court of New Zealand, where a testator had given clear instructions to his solicitors to prepare a will which they had recorded in notes, but the will preparation was disrupted by an earthquake, the notes were held effective as if they constituted a properly executed will.

In December, 2017 our firm was successful in BC Supreme Court obtaining an Order under s. 58 of WESA that an unsigned will prepared by solicitors be treated as the deceased’s effective will. This may be the first time a BC Court has made such an order regarding an unsigned will.

The Court must be satisfied on all the evidence that the document or writing or markings represent the final wishes of the deceased. In cases where the evidence suggests the will maker may still be considering the content of a draft will or persons involved with the deceased have influence regarding the will maker attempting to finalize the will, the Court may decide that the evidence is not sufficient to cure the deficiency. In these cases the distribution of the estate may revert to an earlier will or intestacy where distribution is governed by statute. These types of Orders are not made by the Court lightly and require a sound evidentiary base. Two cases in BC where applicants under s. 58 have attempted to cure deficiencies, prior to our recent decision, were not successful in obtaining a curing of the deficiencies in issue in those cases.  

 

Category: Articles, Estate Litigation Articles

Previous Post: « Articling Student Or Regev joins Hobbs Giroday
Next Post: A Rare But Effective Way to Recover Your Property Rights »

Primary Sidebar

Request a Free Consultation

Latest Articles

  • Hobbs Giroday Podcast Episode 21
  • A Cautionary Estate Planning Tale
  • Hobbs Giroday Podcast Episode 20
  • Hobbs Giroday Podcast Episode 19
  • Hobbs Giroday Podcast Episode 18
  • Hobbs Giroday Podcast Episode 17
  • Hobbs Giroday Podcast Episode 16
  • Hobbs Giroday Podcast Episode 15

Footer

Site Footer

© 2019 Hobbs | Giroday · All Rights Reserved ·